A.
Zechariah's Prophecy
1.
Prophecy Already interpreted
In
a single night Zechariah saw a series of eight visions which were
interpreted by an angel and which described the future of the
nation of Israel.
Each
Vision has three parts
1.
The prophetic vision itself 7-9
2.
The prophetic interpretation vs 10-11
3.
The prophetic exhortation of the vision 12-17
It
is our duty to remember the words of prophecy not to interpret
what is already interpreted. We must be careful that we
do not seek to interpret what has already been interpreted.
2.
Awakened Prophet
The
words I had a vision (kjv, ”I saw“) denote the means by which divine revelation was
conveyed to Zechariah. The expression does not refer to
a dream, much less to a mere literary form. Zechariah was
awake. This is apparent from his questions (e.g., v. 9) and interruptions.
(e.g., 3:5).
Zechariah
was very rational when he received the Vision. Zech
4:1 The angel wakened me as a man who is wakened out of his sleep.
He was not in sleep even before the vision, yet he was awakened
more by the vision. Zechariah was given understanding concerning
future happenings.
It
is important that we examine prophecy very cautiously. In
doing so we will examine and answer these three questions?
-
What are the different problems that arise when trying to interpret
prophecy?
- In
order to rightly divide the word of truth we want to layout
guide lines for interpreting prophecy. What are these
guide lines that we must use to interpret prophecy?
- Not
everything in prophecy is given an interpretation. What
is our duty or responsibility towards understanding prophecy
that still appears as a mystery?
-
B. Literal Interpretation
The
First rule in interpreting prophecy. Prophecy must
be interpreted "literally" as much as possible.
When
we look at O.T. Prophecy that has been fulfilled in the New Testament
we observe that the prophecy came true very literally and exactly
as spoken. For example:
Therefore the Lord himself shall
give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son,
and shall call his name Immanuel. Is 7:14
But
thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands
of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is
to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old,
from everlasting. Micah 5:2
The
birth of Christ was to be supernatural. His mother was to be a
virgin (Isaiah 7:14). His place of birth was Bethlehem, pinpointed
in Micah 5:2 about seven hundred years before the birth of Christ.
He was to be the seed of the woman (Gen 3:15)
Even
though the prophecy is very literal there was still confusion
in understanding. Not all understood when Jesus was born.
The
literal method of interpreting prophecy has been fully justified
by the history of fulfillment. The most unlikely prophecies surrounding
the birth of Christ, His person, His life and ministry, His death
and resurrection have all been literally fulfilled.
One-fourth
of the Bible was prophetic when it was written, and interestingly
about one-half of these prophecies have been fulfilled, often
with amazing accuracy. The Old Testament is full of predictions
concerning future events and especially concerning the coming
of Christ. The fulfillment of many of these in His first coming
illustrate that prophecy is intended to be interpreted in its
normal and literal sense.
C. Problems when Interpreting Prophecy
1)
Symbols
It
is not so much a question of whether the prophecy will be fulfilled,
but rather concerning the unrevealed details of time and circumstance.
It is the details of prophecy that puzzle men. It is the
symbols used that cause confusion.
Some
symbols are very clear to interpret. For instance, the “rod
out of the stem of Jesse” and the “Branch” which “shall grow out
of his roots” is understood by all to refer symbolically to Christ.
This use of symbols is clearly understood. There are many
prophetic symbols that are not so clearly understood. These
create problems.
The
prophetic vision of Daniel, although it is couched in symbols
and dreams, has the most concrete fulfillment down to the present
hour in the history of Gentile nations. Although there were
many symbols used hundreds of prophecies have had literal fulfillment.
Literal interpretation has worked with such success in the past
and must be used to project into the future. Observe that
many symbols in the Book of Daniel have been interpreted within
the dream itself. We are told what the images stand for,
the empires of Persia, Babylon, Greece and so on.
Now
look at Zechariah. The horses are used as a symbol.
What do the horses represent? They represent God's activity
within the world. God in this dream has his messengers to
tell him what is happening upon earth. The messengers tell
him that all is at rest. How do we know what the symbol
represents? We are told what the horses represent.
This is a very literal interpretation of the symbol.
The
horse may have been used as a figure because Persian rulers went
from province to province to check out the happenings and uprisings
etc within the Persian empire and would then take back the information
to the king of Persia.
Then
there are symbols that are difficult or impossible to understand.
What do we do with these?
There
are some symbols we try to over interpret. For example.
Why is the horse red, why are the other horses of a different
color. We could come up with different ideas.
For
example: Our ideas are only our opinions. They are not necessarily
Biblical interpretations. We must be able to sort out what
the Bible says and what other people's ideas are concerning these
symbols. We must be able to know what is truth in prophecy
and what is man's opinions. What the Bible says will not
confuse us but what people say can be confusing? We cannot
let opinions confuse us.
Rules
for interpreting Symbols
1. Remember that some of prophetic
scripture we will never understand until it is fulfilled.
2.
Recognize what is interpreted
already in scripture.
3.
I personally do not think it is wrong to question whether
the horses have more symbolic meaning to them. But, if we
do arrive at some opinion we must remember to keep that idea as
an opinion not divine revelation.
4.
The concept of ‘literal interpretation’ affirms that the
meaning of a symbol is determined by textual and contextual considerations
-immediate context and the whole of scripture. Revelation
has its symbols drawn from other portions of Scripture, and many
questions of interpretation can be answered with the larger context
of the entire Bible.
2)
The Problem of Partial Fulfillment or Double Fulfillment
What
do we mean by partial fulfillment?
Definition
by A. H. Strong puts it this way:
Certain
prophecies apparently contain a fulness of meaning which is not
exhausted by the event to which they most obviously and literally
refer. A prophecy which had a partial fulfillment at a time not
remote from its utterance, may find it’s chief fulfillment in
an event far distant. Since the principles of God’s administration
find ever recurring and enlarging illustration in history, prophecies
which have already had a partial fulfillment may have whole cycles
of fulfillment yet before them.
Another
standard definition is from the pen of Thomas Hartwell Horne:
The
same prophecies frequently have a double meaning, and refer to
different events, the one near, the other remote; the one temporal,
the other spiritual or perhaps eternal. The prophets thus having
several events in view, their expressions may be partly applicable
to one and partly to another, and it is not always easy to make
the transitions. What has not been fulfilled in the first, we
must apply to the second; and what has already been fulfilled,
may often be considered as typical of what remains to be accomplished. (1)
Events
widely separated in time of their fulfillment are often brought
together in prophetic vision. Many times the first coming and
the second coming of Christ are pictured in the same Scriptural
context. There is often the partial fulfillment of a prophecy
followed by the complete fulfillment later.
31“And
behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son,
and shall call His name Jesus. 32“He will be great,
and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will
give Him the throne of His father David. 33“And He
will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom
there will be no end.” In Luke 1:31–33.
To
the Jew at Christ's first coming there was no understanding or
very little understanding of partial fulfillment. There was fulfillment
of the first part of this prophecy in the incarnation, but the
prediction that Christ would rule over Israel on the throne of
David forever has had no fulfillment and those of Jesus' day did
not understand this.
We
will see as we get into this book study that Zechariah's prophecy
has reference to at least three different times in history.
Firstly and most importantly, Zechariah's prophecy concerns the
present time of Zechariah's day. The dream of the red horse
among the myrtle trees speaks of what God's agenda was for Israel
at that time. Every dream of Zechariah's firstly relates to what
God was planning at that time in history.
We will see as we get into Zechariah that some prophecies refer
to Christ's first coming.
We will also see and understand that some prophecies refer to the
end times and the Second Coming of Christ
Let
us examine verses 12-17. What is prophetic here in a partial
sense.
1.
God's Anger with the nations is seen as relating to Zechariah's
day yet God's anger will still be poured out in the end times.
2.
My house shall be built again. The temple was rebuilt in
Zechariah's day yet we know from scripture that it will be rebuilt
again. God's promise concerning the temple will not see fulfillment
until the millennium.
3.
I will again choose Jerusalem. Jerusalem has seen partial
glory and the land has been developing since 1949 when it again
became a nation. Yet the glory of Jerusalem in completeness
will not be fulfilled until Christ returns to reign.
How
do we know that these are only partially fulfilled? By our
examination of the rest of Scripture and by history today.
2. Rules for interpreting Partial
Fulfillment
-
We have to examine carefully what time in history is Zechariah
relating to.
-
We must be careful not to over interpret, or over analyzing
prophecy.
- When
interpreting visions the primary emphasis should firstly be
given to that near future rather than jumping to the far future
THE PRIMARY EMPHASIS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE NEAR VIEW before
examining any future fulfillment. We should ask ourselves
firstly what applies to the day of Zechariah.
When
we look at the vision of Zechariah concerning the Red Horse among
the myrtle trees, does this vision refer to the present day of
Zechariah, to Christ's first coming or Christ's second coming.
The
only clarity of interpretation of this first dream applies only
to the day of Zechariah. The interpretation of what happened
then is clearly understood. The future is not clear.
In fact there seems to be no future interpretation to the dream.
Some
visions have double reference. These we will study more
as we continue in Zechariah.
To
speak of the law of double reference is to speak of interpretation,
not application. Double reference is not one interpretation and
manifold applications. It is one message for two audiences separated
in time.
The
reason that some enemies of this law reject its use is that they
just cannot accept the idea that the Holy Spirit had more than
one intention when the prophetic message was given. They will
concede however, that once the message was given, it could have
found fulfillments outside the original scope of the prophecy.
3)
Misunderstanding of prophecy
We
must realize that in studying prophecy that we do not have all
the answers. Many Jews in the time of Christ had misinterpreted
the Old Testament and this is clear to us now. It is also clear
that none of the Jews then seemed to have understood the difference
between the first and second comings of Christ, nor did they comprehend
the forthcoming program for the church such as the New Testament
outlines.
In
the history of prophetic interpretation there have been so many
erroneous views that were later exposed by actual fulfillment
that any student of prophecy must always be cautious. Occasionally
some people have carelessly made wild and unrealistic claims regarding
the meaning of certain prophetic passages.
4)
Spiritualizing Prophecy
What
is spiritualizing prophecy? Spiritualizing prophecy by passes
the literal interpretation and usually takes the prophecy that
refers to Israel and applies it to the church today. For example.
Let
us take that same verse in Luke.
31“And
behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son,
and shall call His name Jesus. 32“He will be great,
and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will
give Him the throne of His father David. 33“And He
will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom
there will be no end.” In Luke 1:31–33.
Amillenarians
have succumbed to spiritualizing the throne of David. Because
the fulfillment has not taken place they say that the rule of
Christ upon the throne of David finds it's interpretation in the
church. Christ rules on the hearts of believers.
We
must not spiritualize prophecy by ignoring the literal interpretation.
It denies God's promises to Israel as a people and nation.
God
had a plan for Israel. God still has a plan for Israel
With
some imagination we could spiritualize this first dream of Zechariah.
What could we say? Whatever we say is only our thoughts.
It
is time for the church to believe God and get on with the work
of the Lord. There are false prophets out there spiritualizing
the rapture, the second coming, the millennium and taking away
the literal fulfillment of these prophecies.
5)
Distinguish Between Interpretation and Application
We
as humans try with all our own understand and our understanding
of God's word to interpret written prophecy, Our interpretation
of a certain prophetic passage will be imposing our own view not
necessarily what was intended by scripture. We must be ready
to distinguish between scriptural interpretation and our own application
of scripture.
D. Ten Commandments
for Interpreting Prophecy
1.
Remember that some of prophetic scripture we will never be understand
until it is fulfilled. Prophecy that appears to still a
mystery must be left a mystery.
2.
Recognize what has already been
interpreted in scripture.
3.
Recognize the different problems
that occur when interpreting prophecy.
4.
Give prophecy the most literal
interpretation that you can.
5.
Remember that your opinions and other opinions are not divine
revelation. In other words your opinions might not be what
the Holy Spirit was saying through the prophet.
6.
Begin interpreting prophecy by
focusing upon the clear and unmistakable.
7.
Recognize the progressive revelation and to interpret the Old
Testament by the New Testament. The Old Testament must be interpreted
(and often reinterpreted) by the new revelation given in the person
and mission of Jesus Christ. Sometimes the New Testament
can explain the Old but not always.
8.
We cannot interpret prophecy by only analyzing current events
for tomorrow has not come. Events help us to interpret prophecy,
yet sometimes events are misinterpreted. Israel has been
re-gathered into their land. This prophecy is clear. Yet,
many interpreters of prophecy have placed emphasis upon Russia
in prophecy as the nation from the North. That emphasis
appears to be now a misunderstanding. The future alone will
clarify that prophecy. We must allow Scripture to
interpret prophecy not current events alone.
9.
We cannot interpret Bible prophecy by new revelation today given
by dreams and visions. This brings us to the role of the
Old Testament Prophet.
10. We
cannot interpret scripture without the divine enabling of the
Holy Spirit.
E.
The Role of the Old Testament Prophet
We
cannot with new revelation such as Zechariah have visions and
dreams and thus interpret end time events because the role of
that old testament prophet is finished. The church age does
not function according to the role of an Old Testament Prophet.
The
New Testament prophet functions according to the bestowment of
spiritual gifts as explained by the apostle Paul.
What
is the Role of an Old Testament Prophet?
1.
He was a mediator between God and Man. Sometimes
he went to God with Israel's concerns and sometimes God relayed
a message to Israel through the prophet.
A prophet cannot be a mediator of God's divine will today for
the church. In other words, we cannot run to anyone as a
prophet and find out what God's will is for our life. Prophets
today are not fortune-tellers. There is only one mediator
between God and man, the man Christ Jesus.
2.
Some Old Testament prophets were chosen to write scripture.
No one today will be chosen to write scripture or rewrite scripture
because the cannon of scripture is complete. The cannon
of scriptural prophecy is complete.
There
will be in the last days many false prophets that will come to
you with prophecies concerning what will happen in the last days,
but we must be careful to follow scripture.
There
is an exception. During the tribulation period God will
have his old testament type prophet to minister again to Israel
but not to the church.
In
the meantime keep to scripture and do not fall for Old Testament
type prophets today.
3.
The Old Testament prophet spoke as the Holy Ghost came upon them
and they spoke to the whole nation the words of the Lord.
Zechariah spoke "thus sayeth the Lord."
The Holy Ghost did not come upon every individual nor did the
Holy Ghost dwell within all Israel. The Promise of the Holy
Spirit is to the church. Because each of us can be led by
the Holy Spirit we do not need to have a prophet today like Zechariah
to speak the words of the Lord. We also have scripture today.
We
have the Holy Spirit to guide us in the interpretation of scripture.
In the kingdom, all believers are kings and priests unto God.
This does not make us perfect in our interpretations nor does
it make us perfect in our opinions.
Please
in the future, we must never throw out rules and guidelines to
interpreting prophecy. Guidelines are given to help us correctly
interpret prophecy.
Written by Carolyn Chapman
1. Multiple,
Grace Theological Journal, (Winona, IN: Grace Seminary
(Electronic edition by Galaxie Software)) 1999.
|